Most Active Stories
- Wunderkammer Readies a "Pop-Up Shop with Purpose"
- New Bravas Restaurant Offers Unique, Gourmet Burgers to Fort Wayne
- Greenleaf Project Cultivates Horticultural Opportunities for Veterans
- The Alchemy of Allergies: What Blood Test Scores Mean. . .and What They Don’t
- Proposal Would Expand In-State Sales Limit for Craft Brewers
Politics & Government
Tue June 24, 2014
Pence Says Tax Conference is About Complexity, Not Revenue
An Indiana Tax Conference held Tuesday focused on simplifying the state’s tax system. Governor Mike Pence says a simpler code will be a big part of his legislative agenda next session.
Participants at the conference included Arthur Laffer, the principal architect of Reaganomics, anti-tax activist Grover Norquist, and former Bush administration economic advisor Al Hubbard.
Their message is uniform: Indiana’s tax code is too complex and must be simplified to create a better environment for economic growth.
Governor Pence says that’s what he’ll take to next year’s General Assembly, but notes the issue is not necessarily about raising or lowering taxes.
“This is not about revenues per se; this is about trying to look at a way that we can reform the tax code, lessen the burden of compliance on Hoosiers and Hoosier businesses and create a more attractive environment for investment through tax simplification,” Pence said.
The governor wouldn’t get into more specifics, saying the conference and upcoming legislative study committees will form a plan for next session.
But House Minority Leader Scott Pelath says the conference won’t produce new ideas because the voices being heard from are the same ones who have crafted Indiana’s economic policies for a decade.
“You have to go on the track record – here simplifying has meant that consumers and workers should pay more of the burden and the people who are running the state ought to pay less,” Pelath said.
He adds the average household income in Indiana has dropped by more than $6,000 in the last ten years while the gap between the average incomes of the state’s top one percent and the bottom 99 percent have widened.